Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

User, Partner Attitudes Influence Barrier Use

0 comments
Summary

"At a time when AIDS has become a devastating public health problem, therole of female barrier methods to prevent sexually transmitted diseaseshas taken on new importance."


This article discusses several studies that examine human behavioral factors that affect barrier method use -- how and why women use barrier methods, what they like or do not like about these devices, how partner attitudes are likely to influence use, and the gap between acceptability and use.


"For some women, barrier methods are messy, inconvenient, uncomfortable and costly. For others, barrier method use is complicated by cultural norms that discourage couples from talking about sexual matters, including contraception. And for many women, successful use of female barrier methods frequently depends upon the cooperation of their male partners.


Male latex condoms offer the best protection against STDs, including HIV, and are more effective contraceptives than other barrier methods. Many couples, however, do not use condoms, believing they reduce sexual pleasure or that condoms are used only with casual partners or prostitutes."


Female condom appeal

"Women like the female condom because it can be woman-initiated and many report increased sexual pleasure for both the woman and man compared with the male condom. For these and other reasons, some users prefer it to the male condom." Based on studies in Zimbabwe, Costa Rica, Thailand and Kenya, and Brasil, the majority of women preferred the female condom but "partner approval is critical for successful use of the female condom and other female barrier methods".


Diaphragm and spermicides

"A study in Colombia, Turkey and the Philippines found that among 550 diaphragm users, some women liked this method because it was free from side effects, while others said it gave them more control over their contraceptive use. 'I like it because I can manipulate it,' said one woman. 'I do not need to ask my husband. I am responsible.' They also were more likely to have used a contraceptive method previously and were more likely to be dissatisfied with intrauterine devices (IUDs) or hormonal methods, such as oral contraceptives and injectables.


However, partner attitude was important. While continuation rates were comparable to those of IUDs and hormonal contraceptives, women who reported their partners were unaware of method use or who liked the method were almost three times more likely to continue than other women."


New methods

"In working with the Population Council to develop a microbicide, the Women's Health Advocates on Microbicides (WHAM) suggested that researchers explore multiple formulations to meet women's diverse needs -- microbicides in gels, films, foams or sponges; microbicides with or without applicators; microbicides with and without contraceptive effects; and microbicides with or without a prescription. WHAM members said that a desirable microbicide would be one that was effective, not messy and could be inserted several hours before sex."


The article concludes that although new technologies will help to reduce women's vulnerability, they must be implemented in conjunction with promoting partner communication among users so that barrier methods can be used effectively.


Click here for the article in English.

Click here for the article in French.

Click here for the article in Spanish.

Source

"Network", Vol. 20, No. 2, 2000, Family Health International