Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

Frequently Asked Questions on Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting

0 comments
SummaryText
This list of 27 questions and answers from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) webpage focuses on the topic of female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/FGC). The questions and answers are about:
  • meanings of terminology including incision, clitoridectomy, excision, infibulation, circumcision, female genital mutilation and female genital cutting;
  • types of cutting and instruments used;
  • its history and geographic locations where it is practiced;
  • risks and reasons it is practiced;
  • traditions and beliefs associated with the practice;
  • physical and psychological effects;
  • condemning and condoning the practice;
  • legality;
  • terminology of local practitioners;
  • women's comments; and
  • statements of organisations actively working on changing the practice.
This discussion includes the UNFPA position: "The function of culture and tradition is to provide a framework for human well-being; cultural arguments can never be used to condone violence against persons, male or female." It gives information on the banning of the practice of FGM/FGC and which international conventions make provision for the health of women and girls that contraindicate this practice, including the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, Chapter 4. The document concludes with a clear indication that the UNFPA views FGM/FGC as a violation of women's fundamental human rights.
Languages
English, French, Spanish, Arabic.
Source

News update from Gender and Development on the Development Gateway, December 13 2006.