Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

Communities of Practice: Contextual Mediators of Youth Response to HIV/AIDS

0 comments
Date
Summary

This research study is a follow-up to 'Communicating for action: A contextual evaluation of youth response to HIV/AIDS' (Kelly, 2000) which was based on a survey of youth response to HIV/AIDS in six sentinel sites across South Africa. This report is essentially a qualitative exploration of factors mediating some of the findings of the earlier study. These have previously been analysed and discussed at a descriptive, quantitative level only.

Field research for this study was undertaken between May and August 2000 at six sentinel sites in South Africa. The sites include rural and urban communities and the study draws on a sample of 760 youth and young adults (15-30 years of age).

This research focuses on contextual factors which mediate youth response to HIV/AIDS within specific sites, each with its own unique dynamics. In this report province names are used in association with each site. It must be noted however that the differences between sites are not specific to the provinces where they are located. Rather, these differences relate to the specific contextual features of each site.The data in the report is drawn from the following sources:

  • qualitative analysis of responses to open ended questionnaire items collected in stage one of this project;
  • further analysis of focus group material collected in stage one of this project;
  • fourteen focus groups conducted with youth in these sites;
  • twelve interviews conducted on sex communication and sexual debut;
  • a focus group and interviews around a youth project in one site.